Singapore’s ruling party was always going to win this election, but in a world rocked by the unpredictability of the US, the trade-dependent nation reached for security. The People’s Action Party (PAP), which has been in power since before the city-state became independent in 1965, won a resounding mandate.
It is a sign of how insecure voters are feeling about the future. The party would be wise to pay attention to them.
Under the PAP, Singapore has transformed into Asia’s richest nation, but it is also among the most unequal. Citizens live in what Freedom House ranks as only a partly free society. Opposition parties have struggled to gain ground in a system they describe as stacked against them, and say the PAP has built-in advantages when it comes to setting the terms of the election — claims it denies.
Illustration: Mountain People
Still, the message that the party knows best how to steer the nation through global uncertainty clearly resonated. Voters in Singapore, like those in many nations, are anxious about bread-and-butter issues — the cost of living, housing and whether their children would have stable job prospects. The PAP should not let them down.
Singapore has benefited immensely from globalization and free trade, but that world order is under pressure. US President Donald Trump’s trade war is threatening the economy — the initial round of new tariffs is already set to hit 60 percent of exports to the US. This could drag on future growth while keeping inflation elevated, according to the central bank.
The economic picture is growing more challenging. Consumer prices are on average 17 percent higher than they were in the last election in 2020. The cost of public housing, where approximately 80 percent of citizens live, has soared, too. The PAP leaned into the uncertain environment as part of its campaign, arguing that only a tried-and-tested team could get Singapore through the coming storm.
For Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財), who was appointed a year ago, this election was also a referendum on his personal credibility. He should be pleased with the result.
Wong, who took over from Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍), son of the nation’s first prime minister and founding father Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀), made his name during the COVID-19 pandemic, providing reassurance as one of the senior politicians leading the response.
He has promised a kinder, more compassionate way of governing, but many have wondered whether this rhetoric would translate into real political reform. Now is the time to make good on those words.
PAP officials might be tempted to think that voter confidence means that they do not have to worry about internal change and more transparency. That would be a mistake. Singaporeans might not have handed more seats to the main opposition Workers’ Party than in previous elections, but thousands attended their rallies. Young people appear to be drawn to their ideas of more inclusivity and greater openness in governance, with some expressing a desire for more political engagement.
The ruling party might feel that to maintain the control it has had on Singaporeans, it needs to further clamp down on independent media or citizens’ freedom to vent their frustrations online. Doing so would breed more resentment. It should not treat engagement by younger voters as a threat, and instead allow them to help shape the conversation around national issues such as housing and education. After all, it is the next generation that is the most impacted by decisions made by today’s politicians.
PAP politicians would also do well to avoid being tone-deaf around economic issues. They are among the most highly paid public servants in the world, something Singaporeans regularly complain about. The government could address this by finally completing the delayed review of political office holders’ salaries that was due in 2023. (It was deferred because of what the government called other pressing issues, such as the uncertain geopolitical situation.) Renewing the discussion around the level of ministerial salaries would help to reassure Singaporeans that their politicians are not out of touch with regular citizens’ problems.
Despite having one of the shortest campaign periods in the world — this one ran for nine days — voters used the time well, engaging in discussions at housing estates, coffee shops and rallies, comparing manifestos, questioning prospective members of parliament and creating some of the most entertaining political memes that I have seen in my time covering Singaporean politics. These lively conversations reflect a maturing electorate, as I have noted before.
Singapore might have voted for stability in the face of Trump’s trade war, but that should not be taken for granted.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS